The AAV9 receptor and its modification to improve in vivo lung gene transfer in mice (2024)

Initial attempts to identify cellular receptors that promote AAV9 transduction focused on a potential role of glycans with terminal SA. Previous studies have shown that α-2,3 and α-2,6 N-linked SA facilitates binding and transduction by AAV1 and -6 (4), while α-2,3 N-linked SA is important for transduction by AAV5 (6). Several previously described AAVs (serotypes 1, 2, 5, and 6) and the novel AAV serotypes 7, 8, 9, and -rh32.33 (810) were screened for binding to the CHO cell line Pro-5 with and without treatment with exo-α-sialidase from Vibrio cholerae (neuraminidase [NA]). This NA is capable of cleaving almost all known CHO, murine, and human SA linkages. Results with the first-generation AAVs were as expected, in that NA pretreatment (Figure 1A) had no effect on binding of AAV2, and binding of AAV1, AAV5, and AAV6 was diminished by at least 2 logs (Figure 1B). Studies with the novel AAVs failed to show an effect of NA treatment on binding of AAV7, -8, and -rh32.33, while AAV9 showed an unexpected 2.5-log increase in binding (Figure 1B). The impact of NA treatment on other cell lines commonly used in AAV studies, i.e., HEK293 (Figure 1C) and Huh-7 (Figure 1D), was evaluated. For both cell lines, NA had no effect on AAV2 binding, while it decreased binding of AAV6 and increased binding of AAV9 to the same extent as observed with Pro-5 cells. The electrophoretic mobility of the 3 primary capsid proteins of AAV9 — VP1, VP2, and VP3 — was unaffected when purified vector was treated with various glycosidases (Supplemental Figure 1; supplemental material available online with this article; doi:10.1172/JCI57367DS1). This suggests that the capsid is not glycosylated, which is consistent with studies of other AAV serotypes (16) and supports the hypothesis that the NA-mediated effect is due to modification of a cellular receptor, not the capsid.

Figure 1

Effect of SA on AAV vector binding. (A) Schematic of N- and O-linked glycans for each CHO cell line (Pro-5, Lec-2, and Lec-8; ref. 17). Pretreating Pro-5 cells with NA alone or NA and β-gal should produce glycan structures similar to those seen in Lec-2 and Lec-8 cells, respectively. (BD) SA was removed from the surface of (B) Pro-5, (C) HEK293, and (D) Huh-7 cells by treatment with NA from Vibrio cholerae. AAV vectors (5 × 109 genome copies; MOI, 104) were applied to NA-treated and untreated cells and incubated at 4°C for 1 hour. After extensive washing, total DNA was isolated and bound vector was quantified by qPCR. *P < 0.001.

We speculated that the presence of terminal SA on an oligosaccharide of a receptor either inhibited binding to AAV9 or that the removal of SA exposed a molecule that enhanced binding. The most likely candidate would be β-1,3 or β-1,4 galactose, which is the penultimate monosaccharide on most SA-rich glycans (Figure 1A). These hypotheses were initially explored using somatic cell mutants of the parent CHO cell line, Pro-5, which are deficient in various enzymes involved with glycosylation by virtue of lectin resistance (17). Lec-2 is deficient in cytidine monophosphate–SA (CMP-SA) Golgi transporter and should have a full complement of N- and O-glycans that are missing terminal SA (Figure 1A). Lec-8 is deficient in uridine diphosphate galactose (UDP-galactose) Golgi transporter and should produce N- and O-glycans that are missing both SA and galactose saccharides (Figure 1A). Vectors based on AAV2, -6, and -9 expressing firefly luciferase (ffLuc) were incubated with Pro-5, Lec-2, and Lec-8 cells and analyzed for binding and transduction (Figure 2, A and B). Binding and transduction of AAV2 was the same in all 3 cell lines and decreased with AAV6 in Lec-2 and Lec-8 cells relative to Pro-5 cells, which was expected based on previous studies demonstrating the importance of SA in facilitating AAV6 entry (4). For AAV9, binding and transduction increased substantially in Lec-2 but decreased to baseline levels in Lec-8 cells, which is more consistent with the hypothesis that binding to terminal β-galactose facilitates uptake, rather than that SA inhibits uptake. The concurrence of binding with transduction suggests that binding to terminal galactose is an important step in AAV9 transduction. The impact of eliminating SA was greater on binding than on transduction, suggesting that post-entry steps may also limit transduction.

Figure 2

AAV9 dependence on galactose for binding and transduction of CHO cells. (A and B) AAV2, AAV6, or AAV9 expressing ffLuc was added to Pro-5, Lec-2, or Lec-8 cells and incubated at 4°C for 1 hour. (A) Total DNA was isolated to determine bound vector genome copies by qPCR or (B) cells were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours and analyzed for ffLuc expression. (C and D) AAV2 and AAV9 were applied to NA-treated Pro-5 cells in the presence of various lectins to compete for AAV binding (C) or transduction (D). RCA was not used in transduction studies because of its toxicity to the cells. (E and F) AAV2 and AAV9 were added to Pro-5 cells that were treated with either NA or both NA and β-gal to assess AAV binding (E) and transduction (F). *P < 0.001. For C and D, statistical significance was determined compared with the no lectin control.

The role of terminal galactose in AAV9 binding was further studied in Pro-5 cells that were pretreated with NA and then cocultured with lectins of different specificities (Figure 2C, binding; Figure 2D, transduction). The only lectins that blocked binding of AAV9 were Erythrina cristagalli lectin (ECL), which recognizes β-1,4 galactose, and Ricinus communis agglutinin I (RCA I), which recognizes several types of β-galactose linkages, with β-1,4 galactose showing the highest affinity; neither affected binding of AAV2. Lectins that recognize α-galactose (Griffonia simplicifolia lectin I isolectin B4 [GSL B4]), α-1,3 and α-1,6 mannose (Hippeastrum hybrid lectin [HHL]), and α-fucose (Lotus tetragonolobus lectin [LTL]) did not interfere with binding of AAV2 or AAV9. Wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) had a slight effect on AAV9 binding, likely due to its interaction with N-acetylglucosamine, which is commonly bound to galactose. Lectin inhibition of AAV2 and AAV9 transduction confirmed the binding results, except in the case of RCA, which was not informative since it was toxic to cells.

A final confirmation of the glycan specificity of AAV9 uptake was performed in Pro-5 cells pretreated with NA to cleave terminal SA or a combination of NA and β-gal that would remove both NA and β-galactose saccharides (Figure 1A). Binding and transduction with AAV2 was unaffected by enzyme pretreatment, while NA enhanced transduction of AAV9 as described earlier, an effect that was reversed by subsequent treatment with β-gal (Figure 2, E and F).

The glycan-capsid interactions of AAV9 were further interrogated using a glycan microarray (GMA) composed of 465 different natural and synthetic mammalian glycans that contains 6 replicates for each glycan. A similar strategy was used to verify the binding of AAV1 to sialylated glycans as determined by biochemical and molecular approaches (4). In our analysis, each glycan was evaluated for binding as measured by relative fluorescence units (RFU) in terms of the mean of 4 replicates within the array ± 1 SD (the highest and lowest binding within the 6 replicates were eliminated). Variation within the 4 replicates was assessed as the coefficient of variation (%CV), which was considered low if it was less than 20. The selection of glycans with specific binding affinity for AAV9 capsids was based on two independent criteria: high overall total binding as measured by RFU and low variation among the 4 replicates as assessed by %CV. The highest binding glycans were arbitrarily defined as those with mean RFU values that fell within 3 SD of the highest binding glycan, 415. Of the 4 glycans that fulfilled the criteria of high binding affinity, 3 showed high specificity as indicated by a %CV less than 20 (Figure 3). These 3 glycans, 415, 297, and 399, demonstrated sufficient affinity and specificity to be considered potential receptors for AAV9 binding. The 3 glycans selected as being specific for binding to AAV9 based on total binding and specificity of binding were all shown to have terminal galactose (Gal) with either β-1,4 linkages (i.e., 415 and 399) or a β-1,3 linkage (297, Figure 3). Each glycan contains Galβ1-4(Fucα1-3)GlcNAc linked via β1-3 or β1-6 to GalNAc in its structure, suggesting a structural context of the SA-deficient glycan for binding to AAV9. Reconciling the binding data with cell-based binding/transduction experiments confirmed the role of terminal β-galactose linkages in tropism of AAV9.

Figure 3

GMA analysis of AAV9 binding. AAV9 capsids were screened for binding to 465 different glycans based on the average relative fluorescence, with the top 5 glycans that bound AAV9 indicated (number indicates glycan identifier). Error bars represent the SD of glycan binding. The structures of the top 3 glycans with high specificity of binding and their representative illustrations are shown in the bottom panel. The average RFU and %CV for each glycan were as follows (glycan identifier: average RFU, %CV): 415: 633, 12; 297: 590, 19; and 399: 482, 17.

The relevance of the novel β-galactose–mediated uptake pathway for AAV9 to in vivo gene delivery was evaluated in the context of lung-directed gene transfer. Previously we showed that delivery of AAV9 vectors into lungs of mice resulted in efficient transduction of epithelial cells of the alveoli but no transduction of epithelial cells of the conducting airway, which is the preferred target for the treatment of cystic fibrosis (15). Studies were performed in mice to determine whether transduction of conducting airway with AAV9 could be enhanced by pretreating mouse airways with a formulation that contained NA. Comparisons were made to mice administered AAV6, which in previous studies showed efficient in vivo transduction of conducting airway (18). Based on in vitro studies with cell lines, this in vivo transduction may be dependent on binding to SA (4). Figure 4, A–D, shows representative histochemical analyses of lung tissue, while Figure 4E presents a morphometric analysis of lacZ-positive cells in conducting airway. Lung delivery of AAV9 in the absence of NA demonstrated the expected pattern of alveolar-restricted transduction (Figure 4, A, B, and E). Administration of NA into the lung 1 hour prior to or at the time of AAV9 administration yielded a very different pattern, with high-level transduction in both the alveolar and conducting airway epithelial cells (Figure 4, A, B, and E). The high-level transduction of conducting airway obtained with AAV6 was completely eliminated when animals were treated with NA, confirming the dependence of in vivo transduction on binding to SA (Figure 4, C–E). The consequences of airway delivery of NA on the abundance and distribution of glycan structure were studied directly by staining lung sections with fluorescence-labeled lectins that bind terminal galactose residues with β linkages (RCA) or terminal SA residues (SNA). Prior to NA treatment, staining with RCA was limited to alveolar cells and the basolateral region of conducting airways (Figure 5, A and C). A similar pattern was observed with SNA, although the apical surface of the conducting airway was also stained (Figure 5, B and D). Treatment with NA had the most dramatic effect on the staining of conducting airway epithelial cells, which was substantially increased with respect to RCA (Figure 5, E and G) and moderately reduced with respect to SA (Figure 5, F and H). Higher-resolution microscopic studies were performed to determine whether RCA binding localized to the plasma membrane or the overlying mucus layer. Lung sections from animals pretreated with NA were evaluated for colocalization of RCA staining with immune localization of α-tubulin, which delineates the cilia from the apical surface of airway epithelial cells (Figure 5, I–K). These studies demonstrated binding of RCA to the cell surface of epithelial cells in the conducting airway of NA-pretreated lungs.

Figure 4

AAV9 transduction of murine conducting airway following pretreatment with NA. C57BL/6 mice were given an intranasal instillation of 1011 genome copies of AAV9 (A and B) or AAV6 expressing nLacZ (C and D) either 1 hour after intranasal instillation of 100 mU NA or simultaneously with the NA treatment. AAV9 vector administered without NA was used as a control. At day 21 after administration, lungs were harvested and sections stained for β-gal expression. Lung sections were examined at both ×100 magnification (A and C) and ×200 magnification (B and D) for each condition. (E) nLacZ-positive cells in the conducting airway were quantified for each group as the average number of nLacZ-positive cells ± SD per ×200 field of view. *P < 0.001 compared with the no NA control.

Figure 5

Expression of galactose in the cells of the murine conducting airways. C57BL/6 mice were treated with PBS (AD) or 100 mU NA (EH) in a total of 30 μl delivered intranasally. Lungs were inflated and removed 1 hour later, and thin sections (8 μm) were stained with (A, C, E, and G) rhodamine-RCA, (B, D, F, and H) fluorescein-SNA, and (C, D, G, and H) DAPI. Sections were examined by wide-field ×200 magnification (A, B, E, and F) and confocal microscopy (C, D, G, and H). Scale bar: 20 μm. (IK) Lung sections of mice treated intranasally with NA were stained for (I) galactose expression using rhodamine–RCA lectin and (J) α-tubulin expression to stain cilia. (K) Overlay of galactose and α-tubulin staining. Sections were examined at ×400 magnification.

A major impediment to transduction following intravascular (IV) administration of AAV vectors is the physical barrier of the contiguous endothelium and basal lamina of the microcirculation. The one exception is the liver, which contains fenestrated endothelia, allowing direct access of vector in blood to the hepatocytes. AAV9 is unique in that it partially overcomes this barrier, allowing targeting of skeletal and cardiac muscle and, to a lesser extent, cells of the central nervous system (13, 14, 19). We analyzed lacZ transduction following IV administration of AAV9 vector at doses of 1011 and 1012 genome copies (GC)/mouse (Figure 6, A–C). This was correlated with the presence of terminal β-galactose through staining with RCA (Figure 6, A–C). As has been described, liver was efficiently transduced even at low doses of vector (Figure 6C and ref. 20); it was possible to efficiently transduce cardiac and skeletal muscle at higher vector doses (Figure 6, A and B, and ref. 19). Surfaces of muscle fibers from skeletal and cardiac tissues demonstrated high levels of terminal β-galactose, as evidenced by binding to RCA (Figure 6, A and B). Hepatocytes demonstrated lower levels of RCA binding, although endothelial surfaces of hepatic vessels stained brightly (Figure 6C).

Figure 6

Correlation of galactose expression and AAV vector transduction in mouse organs. (AC) Comparison of RCA staining of (A) muscle, (B) heart, and (C) liver with AAV vector transduction efficiency after IV injection of AAV9.CB.nLacZ at 2 different doses (1011 and 1012 GC) at day 21. (D) RCA staining of capillaries in brain and costaining with an antibody against CD31 as an endothelial marker. Scale bars: 100 μm.

Several AAVs such as AAV5 and AAVrh.10 are capable of efficient transduction of cells of the CNS following direct injection, although transduction is limited to regions in proximity to the needle injection site (7, 21). AAV9 has demonstrated the unique properties of detectable transduction of the CNS following intravenous injection (13, 14). We evaluated brain for the presence of β-galactose terminal glycans via binding to RCA, which showed high levels in small vessels as demonstrated by colocalization with the endothelial-specific marker CD31 (Figure 6D).

The AAV9 receptor and its modification to improve in vivo lung gene transfer in mice (2024)
Top Articles
Inside the D.C. Mansion Murders, When a Home Invasion Shattered a Family's Idyllic Life
How a Tragic Event Shaped Her Life and Career – Career Gear
Joi Databas
Time in Baltimore, Maryland, United States now
Regal Amc Near Me
Nehemiah 4:1–23
Jesus Calling December 1 2022
Kentucky Downs Entries Today
Deshret's Spirit
Best Cav Commanders Rok
Which Is A Popular Southern Hemisphere Destination Microsoft Rewards
Socket Exception Dunkin
Discover Westchester's Top Towns — And What Makes Them So Unique
Wildflower1967
Summer Rae Boyfriend Love Island – Just Speak News
Hilo Hi Craigslist
Enterprise Car Sales Jacksonville Used Cars
Eva Mastromatteo Erie Pa
Kürtçe Doğum Günü Sözleri
R Personalfinance
Inter-Tech IM-2 Expander/SAMA IM01 Pro
Hermitcraft Texture Pack
Uta Kinesiology Advising
Adt Residential Sales Representative Salary
Quick Answer: When Is The Zellwood Corn Festival - BikeHike
About My Father Showtimes Near Copper Creek 9
Wnem Tv5 Obituaries
2487872771
14 Top-Rated Attractions & Things to Do in Medford, OR
Lacey Costco Gas Price
Kristy Ann Spillane
Davita Salary
Quality Tire Denver City Texas
Capital Hall 6 Base Layout
How to Watch the X Trilogy Starring Mia Goth in Chronological Order
Polk County Released Inmates
Dr Adj Redist Cadv Prin Amex Charge
Review: T-Mobile's Unlimited 4G voor Thuis | Consumentenbond
Convenient Care Palmer Ma
Puretalkusa.com/Amac
Anderson Tribute Center Hood River
Ethan Cutkosky co*ck
Lucyave Boutique Reviews
Frontier Internet Outage Davenport Fl
Willkommen an der Uni Würzburg | WueStart
Oefenpakket & Hoorcolleges Diagnostiek | WorldSupporter
Automatic Vehicle Accident Detection and Messageing System – IJERT
Bradshaw And Range Obituaries
O'reilly's On Marbach
Jovan Pulitzer Telegram
Unbiased Thrive Cat Food Review In 2024 - Cats.com
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Annamae Dooley

Last Updated:

Views: 5740

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Annamae Dooley

Birthday: 2001-07-26

Address: 9687 Tambra Meadow, Bradleyhaven, TN 53219

Phone: +9316045904039

Job: Future Coordinator

Hobby: Archery, Couponing, Poi, Kite flying, Knitting, Rappelling, Baseball

Introduction: My name is Annamae Dooley, I am a witty, quaint, lovely, clever, rich, sparkling, powerful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.