Diagnosis of Fracture (2024)

1.

Murray SR, Reeder MT, Udermann BE, Pettitt RW. High-risk stress fractures: pathogenesis, evaluation, and treatment. Compr Ther. 2006;32(1):20–25. [PubMed: 16785578]

2.

Fredericson M, Jennings F, Beaulieu C, Matheson GO. Stress fractures in athletes. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Oct;17(5):309–325. [PubMed: 17414993]

3.

Schmitz A, Risse JH, Textor J, Zander D, Biersack HJ, Schmitt O, et al. FDG-PET findings of vertebral compression fractures in osteoporosis: preliminary results. Osteoporos Int. 2002 Sep;13(9):755–761. [PubMed: 12195540]

4.

Lee E, Worsley DF. Role of radionuclide imaging in the orthopedic patient. Orthop Clin North. 2006 Jul;37(3):485–501. [PubMed: 16846773]

5.

Nadel HR. Bone scan update. Semin Nucl Med. 2007 Sep;37(5):332–339. [PubMed: 17707240]

6.

World Nuclear Association [Internet] Radioisotopes in medicine. London: The Association; Jan 26, 2011. [cited 2011 Apr 28]. 2011. Available from: http://www​.world-nuclear​.org/info/inf55.html.

7.

Deutsch AL, Coel MN, Mink JH. Imaging of stress injuries to bone. Radiography, scintigraphy, and MR imaging. Clin Sports Med. 1997;16(2):275–290. [PubMed: 9238310]

8.

Love C, Din AS, Tomas MB, Kalapparambath TP, Palestro CJ. Radionuclide bone imaging: an illustrative review. Radiographics [Internet] 2003 Mar;23(2):341–358. [cited 2011 Apr 8]; Available from: http:​//radiographics​.rsna.org/content/23/2/341.full.pdf+html. [PubMed: 12640151]

9.

Mandelstam SA, Cook D, Fitzgerald M, Ditchfield MR. Complementary use of radiological skeletal survey and bone scintigraphy in detection of bony injuries in suspected child abuse. Arch Dis Child [Internet] 2003 May;88(5):387–390. [cited 2011 Apr 8]; Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC1719552/pdf/v088p00387.pdf. [PMC free article: PMC1719552] [PubMed: 12716705]

10.

Shammas A. Nuclear medicine imaging of the pediatric musculoskeletal system. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2009 Sep;13(3):159–180. [PubMed: 19724988]

11.

Section on Radiology, American Academy of Pediatrics. Diagnostic imaging of child abuse. Pediatrics [Internet] 2009 May;123(5):1430–1435. [cited 2011 Aug 4]; Available from: http://pediatrics​.aappublications​.org/cgi/reprint/123/5/1430. [PubMed: 19403511]

12.

Canadian Institute for Health Information. Medical imaging in Canada 2007 [Internet]. Ottawa: The Institute; 2008. [cited 2011 Apr 12]. 199 pp. Available from: http://secure​.cihi.ca​/cihiweb/products/MIT_2007_e.pdf.

13.

Wait times at MUHC No. 3: fracture management [Internet]. Montreal: McGill University Health Centre; May 4, 2011. [cited 2011 May 24]. Available from: http://www​.mcgill.ca​/files/tau/Wait_Time​_Fractures_May2007_Final.pdf.

14.

Yin ZG, Zhang JB, Kan SL, Wang XG. Diagnosing suspected scaphoid fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research [Internet] 2010 Mar;468(3):723–734. [cited 2011 Nov 18]; Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC2816764/pdf/11999_2009_Article_1081​.pdf. [PMC free article: PMC2816764] [PubMed: 19756904]

15.

Osteoporosis Canada. The problem: post-fracture care gap [Internet]. Toronto: Osteoporosis Canada; Nov, 2008. [cited 2012 Sep 1]. 2 pp. Available from: http://www​.osteoporosis​.ca/multimedia/pdf​/White_Paper_Brief_March_2011.pdf.

16.

deWeber K. UpToDate [Internet]. Version 19.2. Waltham (MA): UpToDate, Inc.; 2010. [cited 2011 Jul 27]. Overview of stress fractures. c2005 - . Available from: http://www​.uptodate.com.

17.

Kaeding CC, Yu JR, Wright R, Amendola A, Spindler KP. Management and return to play of stress fractures. Clin J Sport Med. 2005;15(6):442–447. [PubMed: 16278549]

18.

Sterling JC, Edelstein DW, Calvo RD, Webb R. Stress fractures in the athlete. Diagnosis and management. Sports Med. 1992;14(5):336–346. [PubMed: 1439400]

19.

Ioannidis G, Papaioannou A, Hopman WM, khtar-Danesh N, Anastassiades T, Pickard L, et al. Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. CMAJ [Internet] 2009 Sep 1;181(5):265–271. [cited 2011 Jul 27]; Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2734204. [PMC free article: PMC2734204] [PubMed: 19654194]

20.

Edwards BJ, Song J, Dunlop DD, Fink HA, Cauley JA. Functional decline after incident wrist fractures--Study of Osteoporotic Fractures: prospective cohort study. BMJ [Internet] 2010;341:c3324. [cited 2011 Sep 22]; Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2900548. [PMC free article: PMC2900548] [PubMed: 20616099]

21.

Weiss AK, Hame SL. Managing stress fractures in athletes. J Muscoskel Med [Internet] 2010 Dec 5;27(12):1–11. [cited 2011 Dec 13]; Available from: http://www​.musculoskeletalnetwork​.com/display​/article/1145622/1749514.

22.

Scherl SA, Endom EE. UpToDate [Internet]. Version 19.2. Waltham (MA): UpToDate; Oct 26, 2010. [cited 2011 Jul 27]. Orthopedic aspects of child abuse. c. 2005- . Available from: http://www​.uptodate.com Subscription required.

23.

Mandell GA, Eggli DF, Gilday DL, Heyman S, Leonard JC, Miller JH, et al. Procedure guideline for renal cortical scintigraphy in children. Society of Nuclear Medicine. J Nucl Med. 1997;38(10):1644–1646. [PubMed: 9379207]

24.

Gaeta M, Minutoli F, Scribano E, Ascenti G, Vinci S, Bruschetta D, et al. CT and MR imaging findings in athletes with early tibial stress injuries: comparison with bone scintigraphy findings and emphasis on cortical abnormalities. Radiology [Internet] 2005 May;235(2):553–561. [cited 2011 Nov 18]; Available from: http://radiology​.rsna​.org/content/235/2/553.full.pdf+html. [PubMed: 15858094]

25.

Hodler J, Steinert H, Zanetti M, Frolicher U, Rogala J, Stumpe K, et al. Radiographically negative stress related bone injury. MR imaging versus two-phase bone scintigraphy. Acta Radiol. 1998 Jul;39(4):416–420. [PubMed: 9685830]

26.

Ishibashi Y, Okamura Y, Otsuka H, Nishizawa K, Sasaki T, Toh S. Comparison of scintigraphy and magnetic resonance imaging for stress injuries of bone. Clin J Sport Med. 2002 Mar;12(2):79–84. [PubMed: 11953553]

27.

Kiuru MJ, Pihlajamaki HK, Hietanen HJ, Ahovuo JA. MR imaging, bone scintigraphy, and radiography in bone stress injuries of the pelvis and the lower extremity. Acta Radiol. 2002 Mar;43(2):207–212. [PubMed: 12010306]

28.

Shin AY, Morin WD, Gorman JD, Jones SB, Lapinsky AS. The superiority of magnetic resonance imaging in differentiating the cause of hip pain in endurance athletes. Am J Sports Med. 1996 Mar;24(2):168–176. [PubMed: 8775115]

29.

Groves AM, Cheow HK, Balan KK, Housden BA, Bearcroft PW, Dixon AK. 16-Detector multislice CT in the detection of stress fractures: a comparison with skeletal scintigraphy. Clin Radiol. 2005 Oct;60(10):1100–1105. [PubMed: 16179170]

30.

Groves AM, Cheow H, Balan K, Courtney H, Bearcroft P, Dixon A. 16-MDCT in the detection of occult wrist fractures: a comparison with skeletal scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet] 2005 May;184(5):1470–1474. [cited 2011 Nov 18]; Available from: http://www​.ajronline​.org/content/184/5/1470.full.pdf+html. [PubMed: 15855098]

31.

Hesslewood SE. European system for reporting adverse reactions to and defects in radiopharmaceuticals: annual report 2000. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2002 May;29(5):BP13–BP19. [PubMed: 11976816]

32.

Technetium Tc 99m medronate (systemic). Drugs.com [Internet]. Auckland (NZ): Drugs.com; Nov 5, 1994. [cited 2011 Apr 6]. c2000 - . Available from: http://www​.drugs.com​/mmx/technetium-tc-99m-medronate.html.

33.

Drugs.com [Internet]. Auckland (NZ): Drugs.com; [cited 2011 Apr 6]. Technetium Tc 99m sulfur colloid side effects. c2000 - . Available from: http://www​.drugs.com​/sfx/technetium-tc-99m-sulfur-colloid-side-effects.html.

34.

Mandell GA. Nuclear medicine in pediatric orthopedics. Semin Nucl Med. 1998 Jan;28(1):95–115. [PubMed: 9467195]

35.

Siddiqi NH. Medscape reference [Internet]. New York: WebMD; Apr 20, 2011. [cited 2011 Oct 5]. Contrast medium reactions. c1994 - . Available from: http://emedicine​.medscape​.com/article/422855-overview.

36.

ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media. ACR manual on contrast media [Internet]. Version 7. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology; 2010. [cited 2011 Oct 5]. Available from: http://www​.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories​/quality_safety​/contrast_manual/FullManual.aspx.

37.

College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario. Independent health facilities: clinical practice parameters and facility standards; magnetic resonance imaging [Internet]. 2nd ed. Toronto: The College; 2009. [cited 2011 Jun 13]. [revised 2010 Apr]. Available from: http://www​.cpso.on.ca​/uploadedFiles/policies​/guidelines/facilties/MagneticRI.pdf.

38.

Silberstein EB. Prevalence of adverse reactions to positron emitting radiopharmaceuticals in nuclear medicine. Pharmacopeia Committee of the Society of Nuclear Medicine. J Nucl Med [Internet] 1998 Dec;39(12):2190–2192. [cited 2011 Jun 13]; Available from: http://jnm​.snmjournals​.org/content/39/12/2190.long. [PubMed: 9867168]

39.

Schweitzer ME, Daffner RH, Weissman BN, Bennett DL, Blebea JS, et al. Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Imaging. ACR Appropriateness Criteria©: suspected osteomyelitis in patients with diabetes mellitus [Internet]. Reston (VA): American College of Radiology (ACR); 2008. [cited 2011 Mar 3]. Available from: http://www​.acr.org/SecondaryMainMenuCategories​/quality_safety​/app_criteria/pdf/ExpertPanelonMusculoskeletalImaging​/OsteomyelitisinPatientswithDiabetesMellitusUpdateinProgressDoc16​.aspx.

40.

Medical Services Advisory Committee. LeukoScan©: for use in diagnostic imaging of the long bones and feet in patients with suspected osteomyelitis, including those with diabetic foot ulcers [Internet]. Canberra: MSAC; May, 2003. [cited 2011 Feb 28]. (MSAC application 1056). Available from: http://www​.msac.gov.au​/internet/msac/publishing​.nsf/Content/D712FA083C78B787CA2575AD0082FD67​/$File/1056​%20-%20LeukoScan%20Report.pdf.

41.

Lee CI, Elmore JG. UpToDate [Internet]. Version 19.1. Waltham (MA): UpToDate; 2011. [cited 2011 Apr 20]. Radiation-related risks of imaging studies. c2005 - . Available from: http://www​.uptodate.com Subscription required.

42.

Kirsch AJ, Grattan-Smith JD, Molitierno JA. The role of magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric urology. Curr Opin Urol. 2006;16(4):283–290. [PubMed: 16770129]

43.

Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. Report No.: INFO-0210/Rev. 13. Ottawa: CNSC; Sep, 2009. [cited 2011 Sep 13]. Radioactive release data from Canadian nuclear power plants 1999–2008 [Internet] Available from: http:​//nuclearsafety​.gc.ca/pubs_catalogue​/uploads/INFO0210_R13_e.pdf.

44.

Grasty RL, LaMarre JR. The annual effective dose from natural sources of ionising radiation in Canada. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2004;108(3):215–226. [PubMed: 15031443]

45.

Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology [Internet] 2008 Jul;248(1):254–263. [cited 2011 Jun 13]; Available from: http://radiology​.rsna​.org/content/248/1/254.long. [PubMed: 18566177]

46.

Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. Objectives of training in nuclear medicine [Internet]. Ottawa: The College; 2009. [cited 2011 Jun 13]. Available from: http://rcpsc​.medical​.org/residency/certification​/objectives/nucmed_e.pdf.

47.

Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Report No.: MI5. Ottawa: The Institute; Jan 1, 2010. 2010. [cited 2011 Jun 29]. Selected medical imaging equipment in Canada [Internet] Available from: http://apps​.cihi.ca/MicroStrategy​/asp/Main​.aspx?server=torapprd30​.cihi.ca&project​=Quick+Stats&uid​=pce_pub_en&pwd​=&evt​=2048001&visualizationMode​=0&documentID​=50A7B0D5472B6AE40A9AE7AA062D42EC Source: National Survey of Selected Medical Imaging Equipment, CIHI, 2010.

48.

Barua B, Rovere M, Skinner BJ. Waiting your turn: wait times for health care in Canada [Internet]. 20th ed. Vancouver (BC): Fraser Institute; Dec, 2010. [cited 2011 Apr 15]. 90 pp. (Studies in health care policy). Available from: http://www​.fraserinstitute​.org/uploadedFiles​/fraser-ca/Content​/research-news/research​/publications/waiting-your-turn-2010.pdf.

49.

Morrison A. Positron emission tomography in Canada 2010 [Internet]. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2011. [cited 2011 Jul 4]. (Environmental scan issue 22). Available from: http://www​.cadth.ca/media​/pdf/PET__in_Canada_2010_es-22.pdf.

50.

Osteoporosis Canada [Internet] Facts and statistics. Toronto: Osteoporosis Canada; 2011. [cited 2011 May 9]. Available from: http://www​.osteoporosis​.ca/index.php/ci_id/8867/la_id/1.htm.

51.

Badley EM, Williams JI, editors. Arthritis and related conditions: an ICES practice atlas. Toronto: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES); 1998. [cited 2011 May 11]. Osteoporotic fractures: incidence and impact [Internet]. Chapter Chapter 8. pp. 142–156. Available from: http://www​.ices.on.ca​/WebBuild/site/ices-internet-upload​/file_collection​/Arth-chp8-.pdf.

52.

Beloosesky Y, Hershkovitz A, Guz A, Golan H, Salai M, Weiss A. Clinical characteristics and long-term mortality of occult hip fracture elderly patients. Injury. 2010 Apr;41(4):343–347. [PubMed: 19744653]

53.

Saskatchewan seniors experiencing hip fracture: characteristics and health outcomes [Internet]. Saskatoon (SK): Health Quality Council; 2003. [cited 2011 May 24]. Available from: http://www​.hqc.sk.ca/download​.jsp?foxXpxdn37s7xOnppd5SMjBIzBf0QfLQkUwK4QBZaJsVTCVUR8rxHQ==

54.

Philipson MR, Parker PJ. Stress fractures. Orthopaedics Trauma. 2009;23(2):137–143.

55.

Hod N, Ashkenazi I, Levi Y, Fire G, Drori M, Cohen I, et al. Characteristics of skeletal stress fractures in female military recruits of the Israel defense forces on bone scintigraphy. Clin Nucl Med. 2006 Dec;31(12):742–749. [PubMed: 17117066]

56.

Fanciullo JJ, Bell CL. Stress fractures of the sacrum and lower extremity. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1996;8(2):158–162. [PubMed: 8732801]

57.

Fredericson M, Bergman AG, Hoffman KL, Dillingham MS. Tibial stress reaction in runners. Correlation of clinical symptoms and scintigraphy with a new magnetic resonance imaging grading system. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(4):472–481. [PubMed: 7573660]

58.

Kanstrup IL. Bone scintigraphy in sports medicine: a review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 1997;7(6):322–330. [PubMed: 9458497]

59.

Lentle BC, Brown JP, Khan A, Leslie WD, Levesque J, Lyons DJ, et al. Recognizing and reporting vertebral fractures: reducing the risk of future osteoporotic fractures. Can Assoc Radiol. J. 2007 Feb;58(1):27–36. [PubMed: 17408160]

60.

Brunner LC, Eshilian-Oates L, Kuo TY. Hip fractures in adults. Am Fam Physician. 2003 Feb 1;67(3):537–542. [PubMed: 12588076]

61.

Kasai S, Li F, Shiraishi J, Li Q, Doi K. Computerized detection of vertebral compression fractures on lateral chest radiographs: preliminary results with a tool for early detection of osteoporosis. Med Phys. 2006 Dec;33(12):4664–4674. [PubMed: 17278819]

62.

Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM, Atkinson S, Brown JP, Feldman S, et al. 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. CMAJ [Internet] 2010 Nov 23;182(17):1864–1873. [cited 2011 Jul 27]; Available from: http://www​.cmaj.ca/content/182/17/1864​.long. [PMC free article: PMC2988535] [PubMed: 20940232]

63.

Mak JC, Cameron ID, March LM.National Health and Medical Research Council. Evidence-based guidelines for the management of hip fractures in older persons: an update. Med J Aust. 2010 Jan 4;192(1):37–41. [PubMed: 20047547]

64.

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the surgeon general [Internet]. Rockville (MD): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon General; 2004. [cited 2011 Jun 2]. Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/books/NBK45513/pdf/TOC.pdf.

65.

Leslie WD, Derksen S, Prior HJ, Lix LM, Metge C, O'neil J. The interaction of ethnicity and chronic disease as risk factors for osteoporotic fractures: a comparison in Canadian Aboriginals and non-Aboriginals. Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(9):1358–1368. [PubMed: 16770522]

66.

Bakri D, Bar-Shalom R, Ben Arush MW, Postovsky S. Value of routine bone scans in patients with bone sarcomas before local treatment. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011 Mar;33(2):103–106. [PubMed: 20975585]

67.

Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, Hellstrom M. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology [Internet] 2002;222(2):337–345. [cited 2011 Jun 13]; Available from: http://radiology​.rsnajnls​.org/content/222/2/337.long. [PubMed: 11818597]

68.

Murphy KJ, Brunberg JA. Adult claustrophobia, anxiety and sedation in MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;15(1):51–54. [PubMed: 9084025]

69.

MacKenzie R, Sims C, Owens RG, Dixon AK. Patients' perceptions of magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Radiol. 1995;50(3):137–143. [PubMed: 7889700]

70.

Foex B, Speake P, Body R. Best evidence topic report. Magnetic resonance imaging or bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of plain×ray occult scaphoid fractures. Emerg Med J [Internet] 2005 Jun;22(6):434–435. [cited 2011 Nov 18]; Available from: http://www​.ncbi.nlm.nih​.gov/pmc/articles​/PMC1726821/pdf/v022p00434.pdf. [PMC free article: PMC1726821] [PubMed: 15911954]

71.

Drubach LA, Johnston PR, Newton AW, Perez-Rossello JM, Grant FD, Kleinman PK. Skeletal trauma in child abuse: detection with 18F-NaF PET. Radiology [Internet] 2010 Apr;255(1):173–181. [cited 2011 Nov 18]; Available from: http://radiology​.rsna​.org/content/255/1/173.full.pdf+html. [PubMed: 20308455]

72.

RxList.com [Internet]. New York: WebMD; Jan 21, 2009. [cited 2011 Apr 6]. Ceretec drug description: Ceretec™ kit for the preparation of technetium Tc99m exametazime injection. c1995 - . Available from: http://www​.rxlist.com/ceretec-drug.htm.

73.

Binkley N, Bilezikian JP, Kendler DL, Leib ES, Lewiecki EM, Petak SM, et al. Official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and Executive Summary of the 2005 Position Development Conference. J Clin Densitom. 2006 Jan;9(1):4–14. [PubMed: 16731426]

74.

Hunt CH, Hartman RP, Hesley GK. Frequency and severity of adverse effects of iodinated and gadolinium contrast materials: retrospective review of 456,930 doses. AJR Am J Roentgenol [Internet] 2009 Oct;193(4):1124–1127. [cited 2011 Jun 13]; Available from: http://www​.ajronline​.org/cgi/reprint/193/4/1124. [PubMed: 19770337]

75.

Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Schedule of benefits for physician services under the Health Insurance Act: effective September 1 2011 [Internet]. Toronto: OMHLTC; 2011. [cited 2011 Oct 5]. Available from: http://www​.health.gov​.on.ca/english/providers​/program/ohip/sob​/physserv/physserv_mn.html.

76.

Sankar WN, Chen J, Kay RM, Skaggs DL. Incidence of occult fracture in children with acute ankle injuries. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008 Jul;28(5):500–501. [PubMed: 18580361]

Diagnosis of Fracture (2024)

FAQs

Diagnosis of Fracture? ›

An X-ray usually captures clear details of a fracture injury, such as where and how any bones broke, which help us guide your treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan: This test uses powerful magnetic technology and computers to detail soft tissues inside the body.

What is the diagnostic tool for bone fractures? ›

Diagnosis & Tests
  • X-rays. X-rays usually confirm whether a person has a broken bone and where any loose bony pieces may be. ...
  • BMD Test. One of the first tests a healthcare professional will order is a bone mineral density (BMD) test. ...
  • FRAX® Tool. ...
  • Blood Tests. ...
  • Additional Imaging.

What is the nursing diagnosis of fracture? ›

Based on the assessment data gathered, the nursing diagnoses developed include: Acute pain related to fracture, soft tissue injury, and muscle spasm. Impaired physical mobility related to fracture. Risk for infection related to opening in the skin in an open fracture.

How do you confirm a fracture? ›

X-rays: An X-ray will confirm any fractures, and show how damaged your bones are. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI): Your provider might use an MRI to get a complete picture of the damage to your bones and the area around them. An MRI will show tissue like cartilage and ligaments around your bones too.

How do you diagnose a closed fracture? ›

A closed fracture is diagnosed with a patient history which will include questions about how the injury occurred and a physical examination. Tests used to diagnose the location and extent of a fracture may include: X-ray. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan.

What is the best diagnostic test for a fracture? ›

An X-ray usually captures clear details of a fracture injury, such as where and how any bones broke, which help us guide your treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan: This test uses powerful magnetic technology and computers to detail soft tissues inside the body.

What is the diagnostic technique for bone fracture? ›

Diagnosis of Fractures

A fracture is diagnosed after a physical examination as well as imaging tests that may include X-rays or CT scans. Imaging tests allow the physician to identify the exact location and type of fracture.

How do you assess for a fracture? ›

A fracture risk assessment is used to calculate your risk of breaking a bone. You may also hear this test being referred to as a FRAX® test, which is one of the tools doctors can use to complete the assessment.

What are the three nursing diagnoses? ›

Nursing diagnoses are made up of three components: problem statement, the etiology/related factors, and defining characteristics/risk factors. The problem statement pertains to the patient's current health problem and needed nursing interventions.

What is the diagnostic statement of a nursing diagnosis? ›

The three-part nursing diagnosis statement is also called the PES format which includes the Problem, Etiology, and Signs and Symptoms. Example of three-part nursing diagnosis statements include: Acute pain related to tissue ischemia as evidenced by statement of “I feel severe pain on my chest!”

How is a simple fracture diagnosed? ›

A fracture can be detected by a provider through examining the area and taking an X-ray of the injury. If a fracture is diagnosed, treatment at a hospital may be required. Fractured bones must be set back in place and might be held with pins, plates, screws, or rods.

Can you self diagnose a fracture? ›

While stress fractures can be challenging to self-diagnose, you can identify them by these common symptoms: Pain that worsens with physical activities. Light or intense swelling around the impacted area. Red bruising.

What indicates a fracture? ›

Symptoms of a broken bone include: A visibly out-of-place or misshapen limb or joint. Swelling, bruising, or bleeding.

How do you describe a fracture? ›

A fracture is a partial or complete break in the bone. There are many different types of fractures. Bone fractures are often caused by falls, trauma, or as a result of a direct blow or kick to the body. Overuse or repetitive motions can cause stress fractures.

How do you diagnose an open fracture? ›

Examine the wound and fracture site, checking for damage to soft tissues, nerves, and circulation. When there is any wound in the same area as a broken bone, it is assumed that there is an open fracture.

How do you detect bone fractures? ›

Doctors can usually recognize most fractures by examining the injury and taking X-rays. Sometimes an X-ray will not show a fracture. This is especially common with some wrist fractures, hip fractures (especially in older people), and stress fractures.

What is use in diagnosing bone fractures? ›

Diagnosis of bone fractures

Doctors can diagnose bone fractures with x-rays. They may also use CT scan (computed tomography) and MRI scans (magnetic resonance imaging).

What is the assessment tool for fracture? ›

The FRAX is an online fracture risk calculator which integrates seven clinical risk factors to estimate a 10-year risk of osteoporotic fracture. It was released in 2008 by the World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases in Sheffield, UK.

What tools are used for fractures? ›

These include plates, screws, nails, rods, wires, and pins, and different methods and internal fixators are used depending on the fracture site and type (Table 1) [26,27]. Bone plates are the most common internal fixation implants used for fixating fractures [28].

What is the most definitive diagnostic tool used to diagnose fracture? ›

X-Ray For Fractures:

It is the first line of diagnostic testing. However, certain fractures, like stress fractures, can sometimes require several weeks or a month to be visible on an X-ray.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Francesca Jacobs Ret

Last Updated:

Views: 5961

Rating: 4.8 / 5 (48 voted)

Reviews: 95% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Francesca Jacobs Ret

Birthday: 1996-12-09

Address: Apt. 141 1406 Mitch Summit, New Teganshire, UT 82655-0699

Phone: +2296092334654

Job: Technology Architect

Hobby: Snowboarding, Scouting, Foreign language learning, Dowsing, Baton twirling, Sculpting, Cabaret

Introduction: My name is Francesca Jacobs Ret, I am a innocent, super, beautiful, charming, lucky, gentle, clever person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.